Budget allocations for one rank one pension ,pl click the link :

 

http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/et-now/budget-2014/rs-1000-crore-for-one-rank-one-pension-scheme-fm/videoshow/38127455.cms


ONE-RANK, ONE-PENSION SCHEME 
Ex-servicemen term it eyewash 
Mehakdeep Grewal
Tribune News Service
Chandigarh, July 10
Ex-servicemen were left discontented with the Budget of Rs 1,000 crore allocated for the one-rank, one-pension (OROP) scheme. The retired military personnel alleged that the Budget announced was mere eye-wash.

The defence personnel criticised the Budget and claimed that the BJP government in its manifesto had committed to the armed forces personnel that they would implement OROP in its true form, however they failed to do so.
As per the defence personnel, the OROP policy should grant same pension to two pensioners irrespective of the date of their retirement provided they comply with two conditions, the first being that the persons should have same rank and secondly their length of service should be the same.
The Budget allocated for OROP is a joke. The Finance Minister has bluffed us for this amount is not enough.
— Brig (retd) Harwant Singh, president, All-India Defence Brotherhood

The government has played into the hands of bureaucrats. Though the definition of OROP is very clear, yet the government has failed to allocate the needed Budget for it. Over three decades, the ex-servicemen have repeatedly sought the government’s support on the issue .
 
— Brig (retd) Kuldip Singh Kahlon, president, All-India Defence Brotherhood,

 

 

 



08 Jul, 2014 9:09p.m.

GOVERNMENT OF INDIA

MINISTRY OF  DEFENCE

RAJYA SABHA

QUESTION NO  168

ANSWERED ON  08.07.2014

Implementation of One Rank One Pension scheme


168  DR. T. SUBBARAMI REDDY

Will the Minister of DEFENCE be pleased to satate :-


(a) the status of implementation of One Rank One Pension scheme (OROP) for the ex-servicemen;

(b) whether orders have been issued to the concerned pension authorities for re-calculation of pension of ex-servicemen on the basis of OROP;

(c) if so, the details thereof; and

(d) if not, the reasons for the delay in implementing the scheme and by what time it is expected to be implemented covering all the ex-servicemen?




ANSWER

   

MINISTER OF STATE IN THE MINISTRY OF DEFENCE (RAO INDERJIT SINGH)


(a) to (d): The principle of One Rank One Pension for the Armed Forces has been accepted by the Government. The modalities for implementation were discussed with various stakeholders and are presently under consideration of the Government. It will be implemented once the modalities are approved by the Government.

(Source-Central Govt Emp blog)

Source of information :areal view blog( Air Marshal (retd) S Y Savur PVSM AVSM )

Minutes of First meeting of the Working Group for implementation of

One Rank One Pension

 

          In order to discuss the modalities of implementation of One Rank One Pension (OROP), first meeting of Working Group constituted as per MoD’s decision dated 24th April, 2014 was held on 2nd May 2014 in the conference hall of CGDA’s office. The meeting was chaired by CGDA.

 

2.       Opening the discussion, CGDA welcomed the members and intimated the mandate given to the working group as per MoD ID dated 24th April 2014. CGDA also stated that for implementation of OROP, the solution be practicable and implementable within the reasonable time frame. 

 

3.       Pr, CDA (P) Allahabad made a a presentation amplifying the definition of OROP and key terms used in the same. Pr. CDA(P) presented two options for consideration of the working group for implementation of OROP. Copy of presentation made by Pr. CDA (P) is attached herewith. After presenting the options, it was stated that working group may make a consensus on basic parameters viz. cut off date, definition of current and past pensioners, future enhancements etc to finalise the proposal in real terms. Pr. CDA (P) further opined that option – I which provides revision of pension based on arithmetical mean rates of pension of post-2006 pensioners having equal qualifying service, is practicable one and could be expeditiously implemented by Pension Disbursing agencies in a reasonable time frame.

 

4.       Reps of Services made following points for consideration of the working group: -

 

a)       Enhancement taken place during service of a personnel has been average down in Option –I.

 

b)      Cut-off date shall be taken as 1.4.2014 and pensioners retired prior to this date shall be treated as past pensioners. 

 

c)       As future enhancements have to be automatically passed on to the pensioners, Service proposal for annual revision of OROP tables could also be considered.

 

d)      Option projected by Pr. CDA (P) will just bridge the gap and will not establish OROP.

          e)       Benefits shall also be considered for JCO/OR.

 

5.       After detailed discussion, the following points were deliberated up on: -

 

i)        As mandate given to the working group is to establish parity in pensions, establishing pay parity is beyond its purview. 

 

ii)       In his Interim Budget speech for the years 2014-13 (attached as Annexure -2), the Hon’ble FM announced that Government has accepted the principle of OROP for Defence Forces ad thus decided to close the gap in pensions between Pre-2006 retirees and Post-2006 retirees. He also specifically mentioned that as a result of changes in pension rules applicable to defence Forces notified on three occasions in 2006, 2010 & 2013, the gap between Pre-2006 retirees and Post-2006 retirees has been closed in ranks – Havildar, Nb Subedar, Subedar and Subedar Major. The gap that exists in the ranks of sepoy, Naik, and in the ranks of Major & above is now proposed to be bridged by walking “the last mile and close the gap for all retirees in all ranks.” Based on this inference is drawn that Pre-2006 retirees shall be consideredPast retirees. Accordingly, those who have travelled in the regime of 6th CPC and retired thereafter shall be treated asCurrent Retirees.     

 

iii)      Date of implementation of new recommendations shall be from 1.4.2014.

 

iv)      Annual incremental increase in pension as proposed by Services would lead to change in existing pension structure which is not in the domain of working group and also not practical one. Hence, further enhancements in pension shall be considered based on recommendations of Seventh Pay Commission recommendations.

 

6.       CGDA stressed on the need to understand the key terms used in the definition of OROP provided by MoD through the minutes of the meeting held on 26.2.2014, with greater clarity so as to arrive at the best possible solution. Reps of Services concluded that for better appreciation of the two options presented by Pr. CDA (P) during the meeting, they need a thorough examination and they will revert on the same. However, it was suggested to have formal discussion between reps of Services and reps of CGDA/Pr. CDA (P) to discuss some points of doubt. Keeping in view the time line given to the working group CGDA advised to have the discussions on the same day and views of Services shall be given to CGDA office positively by 5th May 2014 to examine the same.

 

7.       Meeting ended with a vote of thanks to the chair.

 

Signed by all participants

 

Appendix –I

 

Points of discussion held between Reps of Services and reps of CGDA, PCDA (P) on 2nd May 2014

 

The discussion was chaired by PCDA (P) Allahabad.

 

1.       Reps of Services intimated that they have gone through option-I and have the following points for consideration/clarification.

 

i) Anomaly in rated for pension for higher qualifying service vis-ŕ-vis lower qualifying service in same rank shall be considered for removal.

 

ii) Anomaly in rates of pension for higher rank vis-ŕ-vis lower rank in same qualifying service shall also be considered for removal.